Critical Response Essay

In the clause epidemic or Panic (2010) by Brian Molloy and the article Hindsight is easy (2010) by Erica grove, they both discuss the way WHO reply to the clap of H1N1 influenza and they present different perspectives on how the capital was spent on and how the option was distri moreovered. Molloy is neutral about the WHOs response of H1N1 influenza outbreak, while Molloy is highly skeptical. First, Molloy argues that WHO organise every unrivalled into a panic about H1N1, but it is not the threat people imaged it to be.Grove, however, states that it is requisite for the WHO and the government to takethe threat of H1N1 seriously. Next, Molloy claims that British government spend a mussiness of money on vaccine which makes deuce major pharmaceutical companies earn billions from swine flu, and in that respect is a conflict of interest amidst the government and drug manufactures. He believes that this money should be spent on a right situation like circumstances disable inste ad of treating flu. Grove in addition believes that there is a mismanagement of the dispersal of vaccine.Discussion Molloy claims that the WHO and the government spends massive expenditure on doses of vaccine, while the death ratefor H1N1 is far humbled than for ordinary influenza. He criticizes the reports of H1N1 cases ar exaggerated which send people into a panic about H1N1. By contrast, Grove states that the WHO did not overreact to the crisis. Rather, she feels grateful that the authorities took the threat of a pandemic seriously. She as well as points out that everything is always better to overprepargon than to underprepare. Molloy appears to present overlooked that the powerful of virus discount be. In fact, there are a couple of performers like infectivity, severity and lethality which rear end all affect the strength of a virus.Transmission is also a key factor to determine how the virus unfold and be identified. As Molloy mentions that the death rate for H1N1 i s relatively low than for ordinary pandemic, it does not wet that H1N1 is a weak influenza. Perhaps the low death rate is due to previous(predicate) trace the source, infected people are well isolated from the rest of the corporation in order to control the spread of H1N1, or synthesis of a sweet vaccine by scientists in a short period of time. These could be one of the reasons of why the death rate for H1N1 is low. In this sense, Molloy fail to notice that.